Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 40%).
- Reading held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 503Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| Yellow cards |