Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich fired more attempts (16 vs 4 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Ipswich held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 1 |
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 233 | Accurate passes | 515Lead |
| 332 | Total passes | 621Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.