Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (11 vs 4 shots).
- Lincoln was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 27%).
- Reading held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 443Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 544Lead | Total passes | 273 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |