Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Lincoln was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 9%).
- Reading held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 3Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 549Lead | Accurate passes | 186 |
| 626Lead | Total passes | 265 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |