Match statistics snapshot
- Luton created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 1.22, Δ 0.15).
- Luton fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 36%).
Reading vs Luton
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 294 | Total passes | 543Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |