Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (27 vs 6 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 26%).
- Reading held more of the ball (62% possession).
Reading vs Nottingham Forest
Reading vs Nottingham Forest
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
| 27Lead | Total shots | 6 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 494Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 569Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |