Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 24%).
- Reading held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 401Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |