Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 43%).
- Nottingham Forest held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 304 | Accurate passes | 432Lead |
| 393 | Total passes | 518Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |