Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (24 vs 2 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Reading held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 524Lead | Accurate passes | 235 |
| 582Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |