Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
- Reading held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 419Lead | Accurate passes | 303 |
| 515Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |