Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Peterborough was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 31%).
- Peterborough held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 433Lead |
| 427 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |