Match statistics snapshot
- Plymouth created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 1.38, Δ 0.07).
- Plymouth fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Plymouth |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Plymouth |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 274Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 378Lead | Total passes | 280 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Plymouth |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Plymouth |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Plymouth |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.