Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 18%).
- Reading held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 365Lead | Accurate passes | 282 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.