Match statistics snapshot
- QPR fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 11%).
- Reading held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 541Lead | Accurate passes | 159 |
| 620Lead | Total passes | 226 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |