Match statistics snapshot
- QPR fired more attempts (27 vs 5 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 11%).
- QPR held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 27Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 159 | Accurate passes | 409Lead |
| 246 | Total passes | 481Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 15Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |