Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 14%).
- Reading held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 56% |
| 320Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 441Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |