Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Sheffield Wednesday was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 13%).
- Reading held more of the ball (64% possession).
Reading vs Sheffield Wednesday
Reading vs Sheffield Wednesday
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 13Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 475Lead | Accurate passes | 220 |
| 569Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |