Match statistics snapshot
- Sheffield Wednesday fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
- Reading held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 419Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 516Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |