Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Sheffield Wednesday was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 6%).
- Reading held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 416Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 507Lead | Total passes | 396 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.