Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Shrewsbury was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 21%).
- Reading held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 455Lead | Accurate passes | 175 |
| 562Lead | Total passes | 278 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |