Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Stevenage was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 35%).
- Reading held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 52% |
| 469Lead | Accurate passes | 121 |
| 575Lead | Total passes | 233 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |