Match statistics snapshot
- Stevenage created the clearer chances on xG (0.40 vs 0.94, Δ 0.54).
- Reading fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 20%).
Reading vs Stevenage
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 229 | Accurate passes | 248Lead |
| 332 | Total passes | 344Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |