Match statistics snapshot
- Sunderland fired more attempts (22 vs 12 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target |
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 281Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 382Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |