Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (24 vs 5 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
- Reading held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 311 |
| 501Lead | Total passes | 415 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.