Match statistics snapshot
- Reading created the clearer chances on xG (2.09 vs 0.82, Δ 1.27).
- Reading fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Wigan |
|---|---|---|
| 2.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Wigan |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 375Lead |
| 414 | Total passes | 468Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Wigan |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Wigan |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Wigan |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |