Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- Reading held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 308Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 352 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |