Match statistics snapshot
- Real Salt Lake created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 0.54, Δ 0.41).
- Real Salt Lake fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Real Salt Lake was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Real Salt Lake | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Real Salt Lake | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 478Lead | Accurate passes | 344 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 411 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Real Salt Lake | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Real Salt Lake | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 1.01 | Goals prevented | 1.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Real Salt Lake | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |