Match statistics snapshot
- Red Bull Salzburg created the clearer chances on xG (2.64 vs 1.97, Δ 0.67).
- Red Bull Salzburg fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Red Bull Salzburg | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 2.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.97 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Red Bull Salzburg | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 418Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Red Bull Salzburg | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Red Bull Salzburg | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Red Bull Salzburg | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.