Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 6 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 239 | Accurate passes | 267Lead |
| 338 | Total passes | 362Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |