Match statistics snapshot
- Reims created the clearer chances on xG (2.36 vs 0.43, Δ 1.93).
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Reims was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 2.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 328 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 419 | Total passes | 472Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reims | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |