Match statistics snapshot
- Montpellier created the clearer chances on xG (1.46 vs 1.61, Δ 0.15).
- Reims fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- Montpellier was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reims | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 1.46 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.61Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reims | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 280Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 345Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reims | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reims | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reims | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |