Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 1.03, Δ 0.19).
- Remo fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Athletic Club held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 296Lead |
| 280 | Total passes | 381Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |