Match statistics snapshot
- Remo created the clearer chances on xG (1.51 vs 1.40, Δ 0.11).
- Remo fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Remo was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Bahia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.51Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.40 |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Bahia |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 199 | Accurate passes | 398Lead |
| 271 | Total passes | 457Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Bahia |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Bahia |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.94 | Goals prevented | -0.94 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Bahia |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.