Match statistics snapshot
- Remo fired more attempts (18 vs 17 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 10Lead |
| 7 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 253 | Accurate passes | 258Lead |
| 319 | Total passes | 324Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.