Match statistics snapshot
- Coritiba fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- Remo was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 28%).
- Coritiba held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 276 | Total passes | 481Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |