Match statistics snapshot
- Remo created the clearer chances on xG (0.76 vs 0.25, Δ 0.51).
- Remo fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Cruzeiro was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Cruzeiro |
|---|---|---|
| 0.76Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.25 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Cruzeiro |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 252 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 325 | Total passes | 393Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Cruzeiro |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Cruzeiro |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.01 | Goals prevented | 0.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Cruzeiro |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.