Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 1.77, Δ 0.46).
- Remo fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.77Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 205 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 486Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.77 | Goals prevented | 0.77 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |