Match statistics snapshot
- Novorizontino created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 1.72, Δ 1.20).
- Novorizontino fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 6 |
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 340 |
| 459Lead | Total passes | 411 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.