Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (0.00 vs 0.02, Δ 0.02).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (1 vs 0 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.02Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 1Lead |
| 0 | Shots off target |
| 0 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 1Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 0 | Total shots | 1Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 23Lead | Accurate passes | 20 |
| 26Lead | Total passes | 23 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fouls | 1 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |