Match statistics snapshot
- Vitoria created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 1.31, Δ 0.58).
- Remo fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Remo was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 434Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 508Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| -0.33 | Goals prevented | -0.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |