Match statistics snapshot
- Remo created the clearer chances on xG (0.70 vs 0.56, Δ 0.14).
- Volta Redonda fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Volta Redonda was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Remo | Statistic | Volta Redonda |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Remo | Statistic | Volta Redonda |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 341Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 412Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Remo | Statistic | Volta Redonda |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Remo | Statistic | Volta Redonda |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Remo | Statistic | Volta Redonda |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.