Match statistics snapshot
- Renaissance Berkane fired more attempts (28 vs 3 shots).
- Abu Salim was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 39%).
- Renaissance Berkane held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Renaissance Berkane | Statistic | Abu Salim |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 21Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Renaissance Berkane | Statistic | Abu Salim |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 43% |
| 334Lead | Accurate passes | 82 |
| 433Lead | Total passes | 189 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Renaissance Berkane | Statistic | Abu Salim |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Renaissance Berkane | Statistic | Abu Salim |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Renaissance Berkane | Statistic | Abu Salim |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.