Match statistics snapshot
- Rennes created the clearer chances on xG (3.10 vs 1.80, Δ 1.30).
- Rennes fired more attempts (24 vs 8 shots).
- AC Milan was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rennes | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 3.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rennes | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 367Lead | Accurate passes | 284 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rennes | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rennes | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rennes | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |