Match statistics snapshot
- Rennes created the clearer chances on xG (1.79 vs 0.24, Δ 1.55).
- Rennes fired more attempts (24 vs 6 shots).
- Rennes was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rennes | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.24 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rennes | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 533Lead | Accurate passes | 284 |
| 599Lead | Total passes | 371 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rennes | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rennes | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rennes | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.