Match statistics snapshot
- Cape Town City was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 36%).
- Richards Bay held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 398Lead | Accurate passes | 310 |
| 484Lead | Total passes | 408 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.