Match statistics snapshot
- Richards Bay fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Richards Bay was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 20%).
- Cape Town City held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 204 | Accurate passes | 364Lead |
| 290 | Total passes | 468Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Richards Bay | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.