Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC created the clearer chances on xG (0.58 vs 2.86, Δ 2.28).
- Wolfsberger AC fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ried | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 0.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.86Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ried | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 368Lead | Accurate passes | 147 |
| 452Lead | Total passes | 228 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ried | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ried | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.42 | Goals prevented | 0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ried | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.