Riga 3-3 Tukums Prediction

RigaRiga
3 — 3FT
TukumsTukums

Updated

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Open / transitional — model leans Riga

Estimated win chances: Riga 59.6%, draw 20.5%, Tukums 19.9%. From 4 and 4 competition matches.

TempoHigh
VolatilityLow
Expected goalsHigh
Tactical styleOpen / transitional
Upset potentialLow
Draw riskLow
Model confidenceHigh

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

2.12Expected goals1.15

From 4 and 4 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 2–110.6%
  • 1–110%
  • 2–09.2%
  • 1–08.7%
  • 3–17.5%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

84Hot streakRiga
Weighted momentum

Riga carries the sharper recent run (+65 momentum).

19Cold spellTukums
Riga · hot formTukums · low scoring · cold form

Riga

3W · 0D · 1L
Recent →WWWL
Momentum index

Tukums

0W · 2D · 2L
Recent →DLDL
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapRiga +7

Riga

9 pts
75% wins

3W · 0D · 1L · 4 played

For
15
Against
5
Goal diff +10

Tukums

2 pts
0% wins

0W · 2D · 2L · 4 played

For
4
Against
6
Goal diff -2

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Riga offensive edge

    Riga's attack (79%) vs Tukums's defense (45%).

    +34
  • Tukums offensive edge

    Tukums runs into a stronger home defensive profile.

    -34

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Riga79
Tukums21

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Riga55
Tukums45

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Riga84
Tukums19

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Riga118
Tukums-18

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Riga30
Tukums30

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Riga82
Tukums18

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Riga93
Tukums7
Rigahot form
Tukumslow scoring · cold form

H2H in this snapshot

From 9 meetings included in this prediction snapshot.

5Riga56%
1Draws
3Tukums33%

Recent meetings