Match statistics snapshot
- Ajax created the clearer chances on xG (0.24 vs 1.05, Δ 0.81).
- Ajax fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Ajax was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 0.24 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 570Lead |
| 303 | Total passes | 670Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.07 | Goals prevented | -0.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.