Match statistics snapshot
- Rīgas FS created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 0.58, Δ 0.28).
- Anderlecht fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Rīgas FS was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 527Lead |
| 300 | Total passes | 625Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.50 | Goals prevented | 0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.